Bloodstar

Forensic Evidence isn’t the final arbiter of truth that it’s made out to be:

Forensic evidence that has helped convict thousands of defendants for nearly a century is often the product of shoddy scientific practices that should be upgraded and standardized, according to accounts of a draft report by the nation’s pre-eminent scientific research group.

The report by the National Academy of Sciences is to be released this month. People who have seen it say it is a sweeping critique of many forensic methods that the police and prosecutors rely on, including fingerprinting, firearms identification and analysis of bite marks, blood spatter, hair and handwriting.

And at the same time, You have Washington State attempting to pass a law to collect DNA from anyone they arrest:

“Suspects arrested in cases as minor as shoplifting would have to give a DNA sample before they are even charged with a crime if a controversial proposal is approved by the Legislature. “It is good technology. It solves crimes,” claims Don Pierce, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. Under the bill, authorities would supposedly destroy samples and DNA profiles from people who weren’t charged, were found not guilty or whose convictions were overturned. Others believe that this is just another step in the process to build a national DNA database with everyone in it.”

Everything has a place, and everything is a tool, however don’t assume anything is a magic bullet, and really, The idea that Law Enforcement would destroy evidence is laughable, considering they’ve ignored provisions like that before.

Tags: Law, Science, bloodstar // Comments Off